Late Stage Capitalism

3465 readers

275 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

anticolonialist@lemmy.world

K1nsey6@lemmy.world

787

It's expensive to be poor (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 days ago by K1nsey6@lemmy.world to c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world

184 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I agree the tweet form factor drives engagement for some reason, but if the username were “fake-anti-capitalist-tweets” with a blue thumbs up icon, I’m certain it would have moved in much the same ways.

If it was actually impossible to miss, I disagree.

Idk if you can hotswap the content of a post. If I learned after posting, I’d probably just delete the post because I don’t feel strongly enough to put the work into editing and reposting. I wouldn’t have even posted this in the first place because I don’t think this is novel enough to be posting. That’s almost besides the pount but you asked for personal opinions.

Well this is admirable, but:

If I knew beforehand (and was possessed of a desire to share this), yeah, I’d just cut out the account name.

I think this is where you and I have a fundamental difference of viewpoints, that's not going to be resolved.

To me, this would be the same as filing the author off an article I knew was fake, and reposting it with no context. It's disingenous. I'd interpet it as presenting something to the internet as authentic, and hiding that its not. And if it needed the "hypothetical" label, I just wouldn't post it at all, because what's the point of even reading it then?

The source comes before the message, for me.