this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14233 readers
638 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm wondering, how would this stack up on all regards to the framework 13 pro?

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

As for the hardware, the System76 option has a 16" option in addition to the 14", while FW only has a 13.5" display in their "Pro" chassis (for now, at least). However, FW offers touchscreen on their device. Similar chipset options between the two, but the System76 seems to have soldered RAM (32GB) while FW uses LPCAMM2. The FW has other niceties too, like a haptic touchpad, interchangeable ports (though the System76 has better I/O than most), and customisable elements (international keyboard layouts, colourful bezels, etc.). The System76 laptop has the option to remove WiFi, webcam, and mics from the device for privacy if you needed that.

On the software side, the System76 laptop can come prebuilt with Pop! OS and Ubuntu, while Framework lets you go with either Ubuntu, Windows (ew), or BYO OS, but you can install any OS on either machine.

Speccing out both machines with 32GB/1TB and the Intel Panther Lake X7 chip results in a pretty similar price, with the FW being just under 200 USD above the equivalent System76. I think System76 might be using a slower SSD for their 1TB option though. With 2TB of storage (that are closer in read speeds), the System76 becomes a little more expensive than the FW! Also of note, FW offers a more affordable 16GB RAM option that can later be upgraded, since it's LPCAMM2. The FW also has a higher end 64GB RAM option if you have a lot of money to burn.

edit: Somebody else also mentioned the System76 is a bit lighter too, which is neat!

[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I got a FW13 and I already got the lpcamm2 module, waiting for my motherboard upgrade.

But this peaked my interest and instantly lost it when I hears you said soldered RAM haha. Just not my cup of tea.

Thanks, I think I'll stick with the upgrade, although I liked the 16 inch idea, but whatever I don't mind.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

lost it when I hears you said soldered RAM haha

Yeah, it is a bit of a bummer. As least it's 32GB, so more than enough for most people. It doesn't help that a new FW 13 Pro is very close in price to the System76 option when specced similarly, and FW actually takes the edge with higher storage capacities (+ you can bring your own M.2 if you have one already)

Not to mention the ability to upgrade from an older gen FW and all the other fun bits. Nice of have some competition though, and the Lemur Pro does have some other merits like being a bit lighter and having a 16" (non-touch) screen size option

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

not the op but thanks for that, now I'm even more confused about which way to go haha Both the FW13Pro and the 76 are on my shortlist

I use LMDE but I like that S76 has its own Arch version. FW has touch which is nice and seems to have decent Mint support

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

Of note, Pop! OS is based on Ubuntu, not Arch! You might be thinking of SteamOS

The main differences is the upgradeable memory and customisability of the Framework laptop, and the option for a 16" size in the case of System76 (albeit no touchscreen).

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's roughly the same package as the middle power choice for framework, so similar.

Battery is very similar, so's the GPU and RAM. Only big difference is the screen, which framework nailed.

The framework 13 is almost a full lbs heavier than the 14 inch lemur pro.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Huh, my framework 13 has 5 hr battery life (advertised) so I'm confused. It's only a bit over a year old.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 2 points 6 days ago

This might not help a lot but here is my FW13 story.

I got it somewhere around 2024/2025 and the battery life was very bad. Like a couple of hours tops.

I was sad, but lived with it for a while.

Then when I started using NixOS (love it) the battery life improved dramatically.

I think it is because I configured some Framework-hardware-specific configuration thingy that was made for the device.

So making sure you have the right firmware or whatever really does change a lot.

I don't think it's even close to 18 hours, but it is way better than before.

Also, setting the screen to 60hz instead of 144hz might save you some battery.

Good luck!

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

is the 13 Pro different to the 13 though ? i.e powerdraw and battery size ?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, it is. That was part of my misunderstanding but also the advertised battery life is now much higher than it was a year ago (on non-pro model)

[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Any clues on repeatability? How is it?

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, not sure I understand about repeatability.

I don't own one, that was just what I've seen about the chipset, LPCAMM2 memory and checking the stats on the pages.

I'd really like one though!

[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Was it easy to repair is what I wanted to ask, but I got you thanks.