this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
263 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

60543 readers
869 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the link in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post. )

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What is it, restricted access? Am an Android user since 2008 and never had an iOS device so I'm clueless.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They have a new api that lets photos be backed up in the background similar to how the photos app does with iCloud. But… Immich cannot use it because Apple say you have to hard code the URL. That doesn’t work for self hosting.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ahahaha, nice. Loosely reminds me of how we looked at implementing share-to-app (when that was a novel thing) in a mobile OS circa 2011 and we looked at how iOS did it. It was a list of hardcoded targets - Facebook, Twitter. No pluggability no nothing. Our product team was like - if no pluggability is good enough for Apple, it's good enough for us!

[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This could be worked around, in theory

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How so?
By operating a relay? Then it wouldnt be 100% selfhost and be dependant on immich being accessible at all times.

[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, exactly. But at least you can have an e2e encrypted relay as syncthing does.

This problem is similar to the one faced by Matrix on iOS, and they provide the notification service. All of your conclusions apply though.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And not eventually bought by some shady company.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If so Apple would reject the app from the App Store.