this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
70 points (94.9% liked)

Science

3072 readers
35 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
70
The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died (www.wired.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Daryl76679@lemmy.ml to c/science@mander.xyz
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevin@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Those are 2 different animals btw, not one like you’re making out.

This makes it worse, not better. If it were one, it might be chalked up to a fluke.

What is the difference between “gruesome” and “horrific”? Is “horrific” allowed?

No, certainly not.

Again though - this is testing. This is the entire point of it.

No. Animal suffering is absolutely not the point. Humane treatment of animals does not mean that they will never suffer - they will. I'm not against using animals in experiments, indeed I've done so myself. Humane treatment means that you put in the effort and bear the cost of minimizing suffering to the extent possible.

Like I said - would you rather they just jumped straight to human trials and this happened to people?

This is not the trade off. There is a wide spectrum of behavior between "never test on animals" and "treat animals purely as tools."