this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
88 points (91.5% liked)

Games

25285 readers
13 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
88
The Sad Unusability of Video Game Reviews (bottomfeeder.substack.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by inlandempire@jlai.lu to c/games@sh.itjust.works
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"So I was trying to write reviews of a bunch of hit indie games I played recently. Then I got overwhelmed by the pointlessness of video game reviews these days and had to take a long nap.

And, I mean, pro reviews are pointless, right? If a game has a big enough budget or following and isn’t actively on fire, it gets a 9. If it is a competently made but low-budget indie, like mine, it gets a 7. If you read the actual review (nobody does), it’s a collection of facts about the game you could easily get from watching the trailer. Throw in a couple of comments from the reviewer about whether they like this genre or not, mix in 3 or 4 ham-handed political comments, and you got a review! Hit send!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It’s always been like this. The pro reviewers get wined and dined by the publishers and consider themselves part of the industry (Dorito Pope!), so it’s not in their interest to rock the boat. The days of renegade and experimental reviews are long gone.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Game journalism died the day total biscuit did.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

It died before that, with things like the Driv3r debacle.

Modern YouTube reviewers are an improvement over the access journalism of the print mags of the past.

load more comments (2 replies)