this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
88 points (91.5% liked)

Games

25230 readers
33 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
88
The Sad Unusability of Video Game Reviews (bottomfeeder.substack.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by inlandempire@jlai.lu to c/games@sh.itjust.works
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"So I was trying to write reviews of a bunch of hit indie games I played recently. Then I got overwhelmed by the pointlessness of video game reviews these days and had to take a long nap.

And, I mean, pro reviews are pointless, right? If a game has a big enough budget or following and isn’t actively on fire, it gets a 9. If it is a competently made but low-budget indie, like mine, it gets a 7. If you read the actual review (nobody does), it’s a collection of facts about the game you could easily get from watching the trailer. Throw in a couple of comments from the reviewer about whether they like this genre or not, mix in 3 or 4 ham-handed political comments, and you got a review! Hit send!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I used to think yahtzee was amazing then I realized he's stuck in some late teen angst phase and can't stand his content. Watching someone just play the game has always been the best way for me to assess. Streams and non famous YouTube videos are so good for this.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

That's understandable! He got the reputation of "hating all game and being cynical" for a reason, but if you can vibe with that and make it work for you it's very reliably consistent. After all, he's been this way for decade, so in one way or another i expected a jaded brits.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

That's because that's the character he plays.

Your basically falling for the trap of assuming the act is real.

Its like thinking the angry video game nerd is actually just a man child with no emotion control.

Its literally just acting.

Yahtzee does an amazing job of calling himself out when he fucks up, his side work is very level headed and he has a really solid foundation of understanding of the development and writing side of gaming. Which is a lot more then many game reviewers.

If you don't like his material that's fine, he's basically a comedian. Not everyone is going to like his routine. But that's all it is.