this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
696 points (99.7% liked)

People Twitter

10086 readers
1187 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adarza@piefed.ca 21 points 4 days ago (18 children)

i'll take the excel, but i'm making some scripts to automate some shit so i can screw around at least half the time

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (8 children)

2 smart guys apply for an IT position: do you hire the reliable, hard working guy who never takes sick leave, or the lazy guy?

Always hire the lazy guy. They will go out of their way to find a better way to do the same fucking task so they can go back to being lazy.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If both guys are smart, the hard working guy will find a better way to do the tasks and use the extra time to do other work.

The hard working guy will likely spend more time validating that the automation works correctly while the lazy guy won't. Checking every detail, tracking down the source of any issues and fixing them so they won't occur again is a lot of work. The lazy guy doesn't do that.

What the lazy guy does could be done by an LLM, what the hard working guy does can't be.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

So the classic reasoning was the other way around but that was before LLMs so I do wonder if you might be right.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)