this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
162 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

59746 readers
895 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kittygram is an Instagram frontend, like nitter and invideous.

A lot has changed since I first posted about it. Kittygram now has:

  • a developer API
  • atom feeds
  • ratelimit tracking
  • explore/popular pages
  • more themes
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

True...but the arguably better / more defensive stance is "accept no PR unless the user explains wtf it does and/or I personally trust them".

Iow, stop accepting PRs from randos - clanker or meatbag - full stop. The lowest cognitive load is "none".

I don't know you / we can't have a convo why you sent me this? Into the bin.

(In my humble opinion, for a small or new project, that's a cleaner footing anyway)

The claude.md file is cute, but I don't think a claude would actually be tripped up by that.

It's not such a high bar to pass to be honest with you. You'd probably need something more subtle, at which point you're just shooting yourself in the foot.

The meow thing is more like a philosophical line in the sand than anything else and I respect it.

But given the way that Codeberg actually blocks crawlers and agents (and how Claude works), it probably doesn't really do what we think it does.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How does a developer with good intentions prove their trustworthiness?

What about the XZ Utils backdoor? That was inserted by a trusted maintainer who literally spent years building up trust.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 1 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

Let's tag it as "provisional" then. As in, once you have my provisional trust, accrued over time, I'll probably stop auditing every single line. I'll still look tho.

But the long and short of it is this - this actually favours the clankers more than the human collaborators. Clankers are incompetent... they usually aren't Machiavellian.

I've heard it said that an LLM is like a Labrador retriever when it comes to coding. Overly excited, pulls ahead, does some really goofy shit and sometimes chews up your couch (hello Qwen 27B)...but it is trainable.

Human devs are like cats...which is oddly on brand for this project :)