this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
410 points (94.6% liked)

me_irl

8196 readers
489 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Mmmmm, if humanity doesn't get babies for say 40 years in a row, we'd be extinct

If humanity wouldn't have babies for say Even 5 years, it would have enormous disastrous consequences for almost all of us

It's actually really important for all of us (even for the ultra rich, but also the ultra poor) that people have enough babies. China knows what I'm talking about, they're heading for a huge population crash

Same for south Korea, same for Germany

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then lets go extinct, nothing of value would be loss.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, you first.

And there's the problem. All the evil geniuses and mad scientists want everyone else to go extinct, but not themselves.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

Ok, you first.

I'm not replacing myself, so when I'm gone I'm gone. Checkmate

[–] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

And now that'll be the baby's problem too.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Problems caused by declining birth rates are self-limiting.

Ideally, a modest rate of decline would allow for society to adapt.