No Stupid Questions

Trying to make sense of the quote.. bear with me:

So there are two versions of that quote floating about:

Trust someone as far as you can throw them

Do NOT trust someone as far as you can throw them

Question 1: I agree it's contextual but which makes more sense? First implies a limited trust and the negation implies negative correlation with distance. I think.

I like the Wodehouse quote: “I wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him, and I’m no shot-put champion.” - P. G. Wodehouse, The Code of the Woosters (1938)

So from the first link, let's trust the baby (a random baby.. not yours) as far as you can throw it. Will assume shot put than a hammer throw for the baby as it makes more sense. (Hammer throwing babies is for emergencies) Record for 7kg shotput for men is ~20m. Most people could do 10m with little training. Which is a fair distance to trust a baby. Anything more and I might be too late to react.

A random toddler, you can throw less distance and therefore trust it less? And what about a random human, they might not let you throw them.

Let's take negation.. What about computers? Back in the day, computers were massive so can't trust a mainframe computer as far as you could throw it. So I mistrust it less (due to complexity) than say an ultrabook, which I could throw far enough. Of course based on your experience with computers, the negation of this applies.

Question 2: So on this scale (throwing ability), what could I trust the most? Nothing? My voice? Tangible things?

Question 3: does the metaphor hold or am I just trying to make it fit?

• "Yes, I trust the rocket, we threw into space together.. "
• "I don't trust SD cards, discs were better (or vice versa)"
• "I used to trust my scooter but ever since losing my hands..."

Maybe I'm overthinking this and the fact that the negation can also hold true means that it's literally a matter of trust than my ability to throw.