this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60091 readers
1385 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've had some feedback today that Decronym is "spamming" unrelated acronym definitions into threads that don't need them. Unfortunately, details of which acronyms are superfluous wasn't forthcoming, so:

From this list, which acronyms do you guys think can be removed as unnecessary to explain?

http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/selfhosted@lemmy_world

Edited to add: There've been instances of the bot "finding" acronyms that aren't mentioned in the thread, and speculation that vibecoding is at fault. The real answer, I think, is simpler.

Decronym uses a local Lemmy instance, and polls the database directly for new comments. Last time I tried to upgrade Lemmy, it went so badly I had to wipe the server and start over from a fresh Debian; threads on the fresh instance started from ID 1 again.

But Decronym's list of detected acronyms wasn't wiped, so it's been pointing at the wrong thread IDs this whole time.

I've now wiped the threads and detected acronyms for this comm, and the bot should behave more sensibly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't have any issue with it myself, I think it's a great idea.

These acronyms I've never seen before and have never been used by the bot:

a11y i18n l10n

[–] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

kind of ironic to abbreviate the word accessibility

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

i18n is definitely a real thing and it's often even used as an abbreviation in repos, folder structures and filenames related to internationalization/translation, I don't love it, but it is definitely in real world use. l10n is one I've seen before and is also a real thing, but much less common (and even less acceptable in my opinion). a11y is not one I've ever seen before.