this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
27 points (96.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

709 readers
358 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
  2. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  3. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The lower ones get plenty of PTSD too. They just don't care because everybody else is getting some too.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Funny enough, some historians suggest that pre-modern methods of warfare, counterintuitively, actually result in lower rates of PTSD.

That being said, I recall at least three incidents in Roman histories (which were generally not very concerned about the experience of the common soldier) wherein soldiers exhibited symptoms considered to be likely PTSD - one of a veteran of Julius Caesar who experienced intermittent attacks of disproportionate rage after a head wound; one of a soldier during one of the civil wars who was said to have 'lost his mind' after sacking an Italian city and committed suicide; and one of the great general Gaius Marius, who suffered from war-related nightmares and alcohol abuse later in life.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

As someone with aphantasia that cannot really get PTSD, I wonder if more were like me.

I'd be affected by war but I wouldn't have vivid memories popping randomly in my head afterwards.

In pre-modern warfare, the biggest threat is the one you can see. In modern warfare, the biggest threat is the one you can't see.