this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
462 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85075 readers
5614 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This first bill allows the state of California to regulate and oversee all 3D prints in the name of public safety.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Register as a manufacturer of 3D printers

Government gives you an updated, comprehensive archive of STL files your firmware must reject

????

Profit

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If only the government were that incompetent. But even I have my doubts they would distribute anything more than hashes.

Still, changing a hash is ridiculously simple.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They are incompetent enough to pass this bill without a tangible means to do what want from it so idk man. The bill mentions scanning of the files so I don't think it will be based off hashes, but rather some AI driven slicer built into the printers or requiring printers to be connected to an AI to start a print. The problem becomes the question of what is a gun and what constitutes useable. Can I print a Dick Gun? What about a Dick minigun? Or would they both be banned?

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

True haha. But yeah, a file hash is actually uniquely useless in this case, any gcode spun out of a slicer is going to be hardware and user specific.

Just seems like there would be opportunities for hacking and reverse engineering this measure. At it's root, it's a measure that builds firearm information into the firmware, surely that could be exploited by a person who wanted to do that sort of thing.