—❗️🇮🇱/🇱🇧/🇮🇷 NEW: Israel believes that Hezbollah has relocated its core command and operational infrastructure from southern Beirut to other areas within the city and to neighbourhoods outside the capital, with senior officials concluding that strikes in Beirut no longer have any ‘substantive impact’ on Hezbollah’s ability to manage its operations – i24

@Middle_East_Spectator

https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/32603

My Opinion

This to me sounds less like a genuine assessment (it could be true, I don't doubt the resistance adapting in such a way) amd kire like the zionists inventing a justification to bombard more of Lebanon. It could also be that the baby killers realize the frontier on Lebanon is not sustainable, and they're making an excuse to bow out, but I highly doubt that. I think it's closer to the former, and that the settler colony plans to bombard more of Lebanon, specifically in Christian and Sunni areas, to try and negatively polarize them into trying to force Hezbollah to stop. They'd attempt to get their dogs in the government to ferment further sectarianism, potentially sparking a civil war.

However, if that's their plan, I do not think it will work out. I think it's significantly more likely that the Sunnis of Lebanon side with Hezbollah if bombed, and I don't think there's enough phalangists among the Christians to be substantial. It's much more likely that Lebanese soceity unites against its own government rather then turning on Hezbollah in the event of further bombardment in my opinion.

Not to say there won't be sectarians who will always side against Hezbollah, Iran, and Shi'ites, but when the bombs rain down, generally I'd expect the Lebanese to be more upset with the people bombing them rather then their protectors.