27
Calls for Barnsley Reform councillor to resign over apparent swastika tattoo
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)
UK Politics
5506 readers
220 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Anyone got said images? Seems like that was the least the article could have done rather than provide a story without any visual evidence.
I'm not defending Reform. Make no mistake. Either way it was incredibly dumb of him to have even the religious swastika tattooed on him. I just lament this low quality "journalism".
If you search for "Andy Arnold Swastika" you'll find them - other newspapers have included the images.
Basically, yes he does unambiguously have a very basic small swastika on his forearm, above what looks like some redacted text (inked over with a solid box). From the colour of the ink, both the swastika and the redaction look to be decades old. He also has other old tattoos visible - an elaborate cross and a tribal design on his upper arms.
Hang on, he got text redacted but not the swastika? That raises even more questions, like how bad must the text have been if blocking it out was more important than blocking out an actual swastika, and he cannot have regretted getting a swastika in the first place if he left it
You know, there's actually a possibility the text isn't redacted, just really really unclear.
I wanted to provide a screenshot, but when I found a better image, I'm kind of seeing potential letter shapes. Let me know what you think (I've cropped some of the legs off the swastika).
You can make out three letters (looks like CTY or similar to me) with something like a George cross or some eyes over it if it isnt covered up? If it is covered up its badly done as it should be fully blacked out.
Kind of looks like ICY to me. Could mean "I see you"?
If we accept its three letters that have been altered, could it terrifyingly be C18? That would be extra specially concerning and definitely a reason to cover up with priority over the Swastika.