this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
53 points (98.2% liked)

TankieJerk

377 readers
74 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide or atrocity denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. Please redirect any Fediverse tankie-posts to !MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.works to avoid bringing drama to Piefed.social

Curious about non-tankie leftism? If you've got a little patience for 19th century academic style, let a little Marx and Kropotkin be your primer!

Marx's Communist Manifesto, short and accessible! Highly recommended if you haven't read it

Kropotkin's Conquest Of Bread

Selected works of Marx

For a wider variety of leftist memes, see:

!political_memes@piefed.social

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Authoritarianism won't be given up to transition. What a brain dead take

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's the part I can never understand.

Granted that some number of them are undoubtedly just astroturfing for authoritarians, some significant number of them seem to be sincere, so it has to be the case that they actually believe that authority can be institutionalized for a limited time to serve limited ends, then eliminated when it's served those ends.

How? How can anyone be so hopelessly naive or delusional to actually believe that? Particularly when history has shown the exact opposite without exception?

To me, they're as inexplicably nuts as the flat-earthers.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I think they neither understand how authoritarean states manage to stay in power, nor how even discounting that you'd need some paragon of socialist virtue at the top to give that up.

What I mean by the first line is that even if your leader genuinely wants to dissolve the state eventually, they can't stay in power without surrounding themselves with people that are both power hungry and stupid, so dissolving the state would fail on account of those people. I guess maybe they believe it's realistic to also have all those people have genuine intentions, but it's just not.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)