this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
15 points (89.5% liked)

Privacy

4592 readers
686 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
danielintempesta@programming.dev
15
Interview with the Engineer of Uruky, a Private Search Engine (theprivacydad.com)
submitted 1 week ago by noodlejetski@piefed.social to c/privacy@programming.dev
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Bruno reached out to me mid-April with a suggestion to check out his privacy-first search engine tool Uruky. Uruky works on a subscription model, but one of my kids and I were able to test it out for free for a couple of months.
I normally do not test privacy tools on request, but rather focus on describing tools I've discovered myself and already use in daily life. Yet the email conversation between us evolved into quite a warm exchange about his projects, my blog, networks and privacy tools in general. Bruno, being a software engineer, helped me better understand how local networks work, which led to my article about running a Monero node.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

search engine result aggregators, such as searx.space, have been blocked. The UX is now laughable and unusable.

So why are we even discussing another search engine result aggregator. What kinda difference or expectation are we supposed to have?

searx.space isn't blocked because of AI, it's blocked because it's violating search engine TOS by scraping free results for other purposes, and the public instances are easy to spot because they're doing orders of magnitude more searches than is "normal".

This aggregator is different because it is a paid search engine. You pay a monthly subscription and they use it to pay to access Bing/Google/etc.'s API, then serve that content. This works differently than SearXNG because money.