this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
242 points (95.8% liked)

World News

57012 readers
1823 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (11 children)

According to the Bible, Men raping Women isn't wrong. At least not as long as the father of the victim gets compensated and the two get married.

https://www.biblica.com/bible/?osis=niv%3Adeu.22.28-deu.22.29

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Yes, the fee was 50 shekels of silver for raping a virgin child, so less than $150 USD (assuming each silver shekel was 11.4 gm, the standard shekel back then).

This is why we need the Bible to teach us morality, you see.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The first part of Deuteronomy is historical. The second part is legislative. There is still much that can be learned from it.

This idea, whether it comes from the religious or not, that the entire 44+ books of the Bible are some kind of "Do everything this collection of documents says to the exact letter or else hell or something" instruction manual is one of the most ignorant and sadistic jokes of our time, and to reduce it to such is an act of intellectual dishonesty.

[–] cammoblammo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It should definitely been seen as an historical book. And every time you see a weird rule like this, you have to remind yourself that it was being instituted to improve the situation.

In this case, it’s likely that the extant rule was that girls who had been raped were to be banished from the community, or worse. This rule guaranteed she would still have a home and protector. Not a great one, but still an improvement.

A similar thing happens in the story where Abram is told to sacrifice Isaac, but is given a reprieve at the last moment.

You can see this as evidence that God is sadistic. Read through our eyes, it looks that way. It’s likely that child sacrifice was common in that time and place, so this story tells something else: it’s telling people to start sacrificing animals instead of children, and putting a divine stamp on the instruction.

Again, not great, but a huge improvement.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thank you for such an eloquently put explanation! I actually hadn't considered the context to this extent, and it gives me much to think about.

We do have our problems these days, but I'm glad to be in this time; The norms of those days must have been quite awful in contrast. :(

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)