this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
154 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60426 readers
185 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Assuming the user will not be connecting over vpn, but is both remote and non-technical, how would you expose Jellyfin to them securely?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can set pangolin to allow access to an entire resource or just certain paths without the front auth, instead relying on the built in auth.

Your random plex/emby/jellyfin server isn't going to be a huge target and the built in auth is good enough for the limited access your media system should have.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Wait so if you're gonna allow access without authentication then why bother putting pangolin in front of jellyfin? Does it help in some other kind of way? I don't really get how it helps without interfering with apps accessing jellyfin.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I am really not comfortable with that. Limited or not.