this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
210 points (97.7% liked)

Selfhosted

60253 readers
1067 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Honest question, because I know multiple people who are not looking to jump ship since they already have the Plex Pass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_artic_one@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got started with jellyfin and never used Plex but there's a bunch of rough edges:

  • No apps on several smart tv/streaming stick stores, Vizio has an app for plex but not jellyfin so I would need to buy a new streaming device. Yes smart tvs spy on you but the alternatives people recommend either spy on you just as much or are expensive (Nvidia shield) and most of them still require side loading so it's a major obstacle for sharing with anyone else.
  • Casting from the mobile app won't play at full resolution, you can get around this by using VLC as your player and casting from that but that causes it to frequently lose watch progress. Also stopping casting or playing the next episode doesn't work properly with VLC and you need to rapidly mash "back" to get into the jellyfin app again and queue up a new episode.
  • The current release of Jellyfin desktop won't play audio for iptv streams, this is fixed in the dev branch but I have yet to find a build without other critical bugs so I'll likely need to wait for the next release which currently has no target date.
  • The browser version has spotty controller support that stops working constantly. When it does work it lacks any way to access context menus to mark shows as watched etc. If you're using a flatpak browser to run it on steam deck or whatever, you'll have codec and passthrough issues (Chrome is the only flatpak with decent codec support).
  • Others have mentioned the security issues which you can bypass by putting authentik or something in front of it but then you can only share with people using browser.
[–] kiol@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What about exposing through Pangolin tunnel, Cloudflare Tunnel, Tailscale Funnel approach? Would that allow proper client access?

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same problem regarding security because if you leave it up to jellyfin to do auth you are betting on the wrong horse. With pangolin auth in front of it you have the same problem as before. Clients can't handle the additional auth.

Or am I misunderstanding the concept of tunnels wrong? I am using pangolin as a reverse proxy with nice VPN management included. How do you the tail scale style "connect this client to this network that has the jellyfin server on it" thingy?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have a VPS that relays the pangolin tunnel and a reverse proxy serving the tunnel through a cloudfare + fail2ban protected domain. It should be really cheap since the vps only really runs for the initial auth and connection, and once in a while to update the tunnel IPs. You just give people a domain and a credential for the client.

It sounds complicated but isn't really. I did it once but then returned to plain tailscale since I don't really share my server with many people.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm still not seeing how this solves the issue. You either use Cloudflare or your reverse proxy as the auth, which is secure but then people can only use your Jellyfin server through a web browser, or you publish actual Jellyfin and use its auth, but now you rely on its poor security.

Are you saying you integrate fail to ban with Jellyfin's auth? If so that's alright, but won't stop anyone from using an exploit, just brute force attacks. I'm still also not sure why the VPS is required at all.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago

Cloudflare doesn't allow streaming large quantities of data through their tunnels. At least it's against their ToS.