this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

news

974 readers
514 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
dude@lemmings.world
74
Trump officials tried to ban half of U.S. voting machines, citing conspiracy theories (www.straitstimes.com)
submitted 2 days ago by dude@lemmings.world to c/news@lemmings.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plyth@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just ban them all. The discussion about the validity of the election is entirely unnecessary.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

Yes, this is the only correct take. Cory Doctorow wrote about this a while ago and its pretty cringe how dems were defending voting machines all of a sudden. They are all broken, insecure and easy to manipulate garbage.

Excerpt from: https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/18/dominion-sucks-actually/

That's when something very weird happened. A bunch of people who had been skeptical of voting machines since the Brooks Brothers Riot suddenly became history's most ardent defenders of those same garbage voting machines. The cartel of voting machine companies – who had a long track record of using bullshit legal threats to silence their (mostly progressive) critics – were drafted into The Resistance(TM), and anyone who thought voting machines were trash was dismissed as a crazy person who has been totally mypillowpilled:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210203113531/https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/02/03/voting-machines-election-steal-conspiracy-flaws/

There's a name for this: it's called "schismogenesis": when one group of people define themselves in opposition to someone else. If the other team does X, then your team has to oppose X, even if you all liked X until a couple minutes ago:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/12/18/schizmogenesis/