this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
457 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84662 readers
3867 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
457
Bitwarden New CEO has extensive M&A, Private equity experience, Removes Transparency from its Motto (www.fastcompany.com)
submitted 16 hours ago by iter_facio@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
176 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I find this move concerning, and wish that the Founder had looked for a new CEO that shared his values rather than a Private Equity and Mergers Expert.

Furthermore, the change to the GRIT motto is worrying. Trust is useless without Transparency when it comes to code and security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] determinist@kbin.earth 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Anyone have any idea how this affects Vaultwarden, if at all?

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I think the short answer is that it doesn't. VaultWarden is currently open source, and no private equity organization can put the genie back in the bottle. If things get really bad then someone would likely fork the open source bits and maintain a pure open source version, in which case there would likely be a procedure to migrate existing VaultWarden installs to the purely open source successor. I don't think VaultWarden users need to be overly concerned at this point.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

It won't stop them from trying though. Just look at what Bambu is doing.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The fork would have to be a browser integration as the bitwarden extensions and desktop apps are the closed source bitwarden part. Vaultwarden as the backend self-hosted db and webapp is opensource.

[–] Sickday@kbin.earth 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like the clients are at least source-available? https://github.com/bitwarden/clients

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

For now... That's what would be forked, thanks for the correction

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Short-term, no change.

Medium- and long-term, Bitwarden could cut off access to their clients and go closed source.

Hopefully, Vaultwarden devs take advantage of the early warning and prepare contingencies for ~~if~~ when Bitwarden crosses the point of no return.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Aren't Bitwarden clients open-source?