this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

AskHistorians

1311 readers
11 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Sources are welcome, but not required.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its a mash-up of European land ownership shit like the Magna Carta and stuff they lifted from the Haudenosaunee. They were just trying to codify a land owning oligarchy that already loosely organized their various cartels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haudenosaunee

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you mind expounding on your statement?

[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago

Well basically they had a European land-owning nobles mindset, but a bit less inclusively liberal than was starting to trend over there. They were looking for a way to organize their little plantations to assert control over the cities, and they saw that the Iroquois Confederacy had a pretty good system of organizing and decision making, so they made a shitty version of that.