UK Politics

5488 readers

134 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Keir Starmer under pressure to agree exit plan after election mauling (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 days ago by frankPodmore@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mainly sharing for Sadiq Khan's I think correct take:

“Labour has lost votes in London to a variety of different parties, but the biggest change has been Labour voters switching to the Greens,” Khan said. “Without a change in course and an acceleration in delivery, the threat to Labour is existential. We risk a repeat in London, Wales and across England of what happened in Scotland, where we have still not recovered.”

People often forget that Ken Livingstone showed it was possible for Labour to lose London to a left challenger in 2000. If they think it couldn't happen again, they're dreaming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Streeting isn't particularly popular among Labour members compared to others in the Cabinet. And that doesn't include other potenial candidates outside the Cabinet.

Starmer is bad at the job. There are a great many MPs who'd do a better job. Burnham and Rayner, IMO the frontrunners, would both be preferable, as would Miliband.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But are there any current MPs who can get the 20% support needed in the PLP to start a leadership contest? Starmer seems determined to not stand aside, so they're going to have to remove him. Burnham could probably do it, but that'd require him getting back to Westminster somehow.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, someone's trying, so we won't have to wait too long to find out!

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Her heart's not in it apparently:

Well, put it this way, if 81, and I think I’m allowed to count myself, if 80 members of parliament give me their name by Monday, I think that qualifies me to go onto a list of some sort. I haven’t actually even looked at the rules because I don’t actually want to do this. I want the people who have been planning this for years to do it.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago

That’s how Thatcher got the Tory leadership