this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
-29 points (19.1% liked)

Linux

13571 readers
521 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/uncommon/p/1089778/linux-is-actually-very-vulnerable-to-exploits-and-it-s-showing-with-high-value-vulnerabi

I hate when people keep repeating the myth that Linux is more secure than X OS without any understanding of how much Linux gets exploited.

On the other hand, FreeBSD rarely suffers from wide security issues.

Overall, I don't think anyone should repeat the myth that Linux is secure.

And at least if they gonna recommend Linux, they better recommend a good distro with SeLinux, hardened kernel and hardened OS.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mmmm@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I loathe that stupid anti-linux attitude from FreeBSD/OpenBSD (and sometimes even Haiku). Most of the time it just make them seem like crybabies, from Theo de Raadt going down: imagine being such a d-bag that even freaking Linus Tolvards calls you "a difficult person" - he says Linux folks do what they do "because they hate Microsoft" but they do what they do "because they love UNIX" but at the end of the day it seems they do what they do because they hate Linux.

They want to be more popular than Linux and their strategy is... to bitch about it instead of letting their own work speak for itself.

No OS is perfect. Not even self-proclaimed ultra-secure OpenBSD has been 100% free of vulnerabilities.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

FreeBSD has recently faced significant vulnerabilities, including a 17-year-old remote code execution flaw in its NFS service

Meanwhile I basically see BSD as "another Linux".