Science Fiction

18660 readers

234 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

208

"A new report from Nielsen and published by Variety reveals that nobody is watching the most recent trio of core Star Wars films" (www.polygon.com)

submitted 2 days ago by zabadoh@ani.social to c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I preferred S1 where it’s just a dad on the run with his adopted son, before they started trying to add all these tie-ins to more “mainline” Star Wars lore.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

So I agree, but it's impossible to keep Baby Yoda in a bottle. Any other Jedi or potential Jedi species and you can play that out however you want. But Baby Yoda? You can't ignore that.

I understand conceptually the idea of not tying it to mainline lore... But Baby Yoda? You can't ignore that.