Greentext

8195 readers

728 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

553

Anon goes back to Windows 10 (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Windows 7 was the peak.

This is not 'things were better when you were fifteen.' I started on Apple fucking II. I remember Windows 95 being new and fancy, and even that 90 MHz 16 MB ass DOS extension of an operating system had better UI and better UX than Windows 10 or 11. 98 was an improvement, NT was a tradeoff, ME was a mistake, XP was a lurching step forward, service packs can burn in hell, Vista doubly so. Windows 7 was the last time the good-bad-good-bad cycle actually worked out. 8 was bad, trying to be a touchscreen OS, and then 8.1 was a band-aid instead of a real fix, and everything since WIndows 10 has been a deliberate disaster. 'We're gonna screenshot your desktop every few seconds because--' Die.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This is not ‘things were better when you were fifteen.’

It absolutely is rose-colored glasses, whether you realize it or not. This entire thread is.

I think people were just relieved to have a viable upgrade path from XP that wasn't Vista.

[–] powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Windows 2000 was peak. XP and 7 were warmed up leftovers in comparison

[–] opi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I feel like Windows 2000 was peak. Best UI, no spyware, fast... Yeah, it was great

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The whole NT line is crap.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Consumer Windows was just a GUI on top of DOS. NT-based Windows is objectively better than DOS-based Windows. Though both are still equivalent to a pair of brain cells fighting for third place.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

NT cleaned up the 2 routes windows was taking and recombined them. If they hadn't then the consumer windows would have been a lot worse now than it already is. Dave's Garage/Dave's Attic, the guy who wrote task manager, explained how the consumer windows was worse than a hot mess until they were brought back into the corporate branch.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

tbh XP or 2K was much better. 7 got rid of accelerated classic theme, so the whole experience was laggy when not using Aero. accelerated aero desktops are cool but there's a noticeable delay.