this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
1 points (57.1% liked)
Conservatives
135 readers
2 users here now
Pro-conservative discussions
Rules
- Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
- We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
- Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
- Attack the topic, not the person
- Report violations of the rules
- Serial downvoting earns you a ban.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm on the right, but was talking with my liberal friend a few weeks ago about how everything on your own side, including the extremism, will seem more normative than what's on the other side. So I get where you're coming from.
I think the way that Nick Fuentes and Hasan Piker are comparable are that they both would support a genocide of the Jews in Israel. I am not as familiar with Fuentes, but Piker has notably supported international terrorist organizations such as the Houthi Rebels and Hezbollah (including interviewing a Houthi Rebel on his stream once), and hinted at supporting or wishing for violence upon people on the right.
That's all pretty extreme, as is antisemitism, racism, and Nazism. Hasan Piker is the most notable extremist on the left, so I'll never fault anyone for comparing him to Nick Fuentes, the most notable extremist on the right, even if it's not a perfect 1:1 comparison.
I should probably add, though, that Charlie Kirk was by no means an extremist. That "evil" label is quite unwarranted. I'm not even sure why you brought up his name in the same breath as Nick Fuentes and Hasan Piker.
I brought his name because those are the only two right winged Internet talking heads I know.