this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

4242 readers
57 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Radiology has held the most potential for non-human analysis. Granted, if it gets too good, the insurance lobby will stop it.

Most of medicine though, not happening.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Insurance companies wouldn't want to stop it, they'd be hard pushing for its use to be law! Preventative measures are MUCH cheaper to pay for than treatment costs. And they also wouldn't have to pay as many human radiologists.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe. There’s also the CT to rule out X, all clear there, but what’s this troubling image of X on the periphery we never would’ve gone looking for as is.

Imagine AI programmed to only report on the fields the test was ordered for and nothing else.