Ford just filed a patent for a truck that monitors your face, your eyes, your emotions, and your "fitness to drive", and won't let you use it if the AI thinks you're not calm enough. You pay for it. You have the title. But Ford decides if you actually get to drive it. Live feeds to insurance companies. Biometric scans running against criminal databases. Microphones capturing every conversation.
This is what happens when the DADSS precedent (mandatory car monitoring for drunk driving) opens the door for scope creep. Manufacturers aren't waiting for public debate. They're filing patents and building the infrastructure right now.
In this episode of The Long Game, we break down Ford's specific patent claims, explore what the monitoring system actually does, and explain why this matters for ownership, disability access, privacy, and your future. This is the second domino. And it's already falling.
๐ Sources & Further Reading:
Ford Patent US20240249706A1 โ patents.google.com/patent/US20240249706A1
Right to Repair Movement & Control โ eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/right-repair-movement-and-threat-right-manipulate
John Deere Right to Repair Fight โ eff.org/news/right-repair-fight-expanding
Facial Recognition Bias Study โ nytimes.com/2018/02/09/technology/facial-recognition-race-bias.html
BMW Heated Seats Subscription โ theverge.com/2022/7/12/23211500/bmw-subscription-fee-heated-seats-us-plans
Plenty of things get patented, but never used. And Ford owning the patent on this might actually prevent other automakers from doing it.
Billionares have more leverage these daze and it just shows how far they are willing to go. I do understand your point but I think it to be wise prepare and be hyper vigilant