this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
42 points (97.7% liked)

Ask

1518 readers
37 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to !newcomers@piefed.zip

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I personally don’t because I view giving any kind of support as subsidising their problematic views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It has become somewhat of a thought terminating cliche I will agree. In the context of my comment though I think it's appropriate. If the people we purchase things from must be morally pure and politically aligned with the buyer's viewpoint, the majority of products available for purchase in the US fail that test. Even "good" businesses that pass the test still must rely on an exploitative and unethical supply chain for their materials and distribution.

Regarding the farmers market though, yeah kinda. If we shouldn't buy goods from Walmart because they are owned by fascists and exploit their workers, why is it okay to buy produce from MAGA farmers using criminally underpaid undocumented migrant labor? The short answer is it's not. The only difference is scale.

I'm somewhat of a hardliner on ethics and morals. In my opinion something becomes unethical and morally wrong if a single person is exploited. I have no interest in measuring inches and degrees of evil.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

why is it okay to buy produce from MAGA farmers using criminally underpaid undocumented migrant labor?

That’s a strawman as you know not all farmers fit that description.

I have no interest in measuring inches and degrees of evil.

I mean you have to measure the severity of evil to properly apply consequences.