this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
339 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84299 readers
3792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because that's what the news audience is interested in: the impact of the latest war on Amazon data centers. Which can be rebuilt and are owned by people with more than enough resources to do so endlessly.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  • the news isn't limited to this one article
  • publicizing news about the consequences of war, no matter the scale, incentivizes those involved to push for an end to conflict. Investors don't like it when companies have to spend money to rebuild things
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Nah. The comments that say “duh, we already knew that.” And “borrrring” are always right.

(I agree with the otter)

[–] paraplu@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Major damage to US corporate infrastructure seems more likely to have a real impact on the length of the war. Heart wrenching stories about humanitarian crises don't seem to have that sort of impact. Even if they would, there are too many of these stories to draw sustained public interest in any single event or group of related events. Corporate involvement at least has a board who has to try to take action on behalf of investors. It wouldn't be a romantic end, but it might be better than nothing.

[–] piwakawakas@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 day ago

And yet I'm sure they'll somehow find a way to make the little guy pay for the repairs