159
Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
(news.ycombinator.com)
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
159 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
84274 readers
2976 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you spend that much effort, you might just do it without AI. Same amount of work, and you know it's not going to have non-deterministic behavior.
You want me to write an entire library for a brand new sensor that just came off the market, by parsing through and reading a hundred page datasheet manual, understanding i2c or SPI communication timings, configuration packets, etc...
When I can just drag and drop the PDF into ChatGPT and say "make a library for this sensor" and it spits out something that has been working without issue for the past 2 years?
Why? Why would I be that stupid?
I hear crazy claims like this but haven't seen anything close to this with my own eyes (yet).
I shudder at the idea that SPI or i2c are considered complex for someone supposed to interact with hardware. What will you do if a problem arises and you don't even know which pin does what?
Well, I’d be spending that work on a re-usable platform / framework. So if the argument is “it’s as much work as doing the work yourself anyway,” then I think it may be worth it.
Same argument we had for building the SQL engine. It’s a lot of work upfront but maybe we can benefit from its functionality for long after that.
I wouldn’t be building a project-scoped work harness. I’d be building a work harness for projects.
Edit: downvote me all you want. The comparison to the SQL engine was a good one. It’s about increasing the baseline of readily-available information, boiler-plate, test data, POCs… between the times (T1) that I have an idea and (T2) that I’m ready to start working on that idea. It’s not about having the agent do the work. Not at all.