this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
21 points (70.6% liked)

The Deprogram

1913 readers
132 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985


International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.


Rules:

  1. No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
  2. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
  4. No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
  5. No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
  6. Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.

Resources:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Humane Foreign Policy - Kat for Illinois

As with regard to Taiwan, the United States must continue to support Taiwan in the face of increasing Chinese aggression and attempts to undermine Taiwan’s internationally recognized status as a state of its own.

Kat Abughazaleh, Democratic candidate for Illinois 9th Congressional District - Chicago Sun-Times

I want to codify passive support to sell Taiwan weapons, and prevent the president from overruling it unilaterally. If China invades Taiwan, we need to step in militarily to defend Taiwan. We have to use all our assets in the region, to defend the island from illegal aggression. I envision a two-part credible deterrence plan that turns Taiwan into a “porcupine” too costly for the PRC to invade, by providing them with weapons to defend themselves and committing to actually defending the island if they do invade.

Drop Site (@DropSiteNews): "⭕️ LEAKED Email | XCancel

“interventionist,” foreign policy adviser says Kat Abughazaleh, a socialist Democratic candidate in Illinois’ 9th District and one of the only Palestinian-Americans seeking office in 2026, was described by her national security adviser as “firmly an interventionist” who “won’t stop until Russia is made to pay for its crimes,” in written responses detailing her foreign policy vision, obtained by Drop Site.

Ben Mermel wrote in an email to a Washington-based progressive foreign policy activist that Abughazaleh believes “the world is better off when America takes a leading role” and that the U.S. has “an obligation to support pro-democracy movements around the world, from Iran to Venezuela.” He added that “Kat wholly supports the National Endowment for Democracy, as well as its affiliated organizations (NDI, IRI, and the AFL-CIO’s Solidarity Center),” and said Congress should expand tools “from sanctions to NGO support” to advance those efforts without always resorting to “kinetic force.”

The DC-based activist had written to Mermel saying he had noticed unusually hawkish language on the campaign website related to Ukraine and Taiwan and was looking for clarification.

In his response, Mermel said that on Taiwan she would amend the Taiwan Relations Act by “dropping our strategic ambiguity” and make clear the U.S. would counter Chinese aggression “with force,” arguing the region now requires “a firmer hand.”

On Ukraine, Mermel wrote she would “hold the line,” support “funding the Ukrainian war effort to the hilt,” back long-range strikes on Russian strategic targets, deploy additional U.S. “air, naval, and ground assets” to NATO’s front line, and that “She supports the seizure and redistribution of Russian assets in Europe and the United States, for the purpose of financing the war effort.”

Abughazaleh did not respond to a request for comment, but a source close to the campaign told Drop Site that the adviser’s email did not accurately represent her views, saying, “Kat is committed to taking on authoritarianism but is vehemently against the military industrial complex and the continuation of failed US intervention approaches.” Abughazaleh has consistently argued against U.S. support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza and, at a recent forum, said she opposes U.S. strikes on Iran.

Mermel in 2024 attended a pro-Israel protest held to counter the encampment at George Washington University. He has been Abughazaleh’s National Security Adviser since July 2025, according to Legistorm.

Just for the record, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a CIA organization:

National Endowment for Democracy - Wikipedia

In a 1991 interview with the Washington Post, NED founder Allen Weinstein said: "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."[24]

The People’s Forum is WHOLLY funded, staffed, and controlled by PSL, whose office is in the same building upstairs. (more below and in linked tweet)

https://x.com/jccfergie/status/2049364501875572917

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Some of it goes back to elitism, I suspect. It seems to me that bougie culture has this thing about intentionally building a mystique around the skills of the upper classes / prestige roles, so that there's more of an artificial barrier and so that people believe it's more justified that the elites are in the roles that they are.

I wish I could source it, but I have this vague recollection of learning from somebody else that the USSR was big on the theory behind art. Like they tended to understand/teach it well as theory, not just vibes. Not to say capitalist society never does that kind of thing, but like... take the field of fiction writing, for example. It's extremely common to come across the adage, "Show, don't tell." Is there writing theory behind this? As far as I can tell (and I have searched on it quite a bit at times because I find that adage so annoying), it's just ideology but for writing. Some people decided that stories are better when things are more understated and implicative and made it into a dogma. And this kind of thing means it's a lot harder to learn how to write effectively than it should be. But the presence of LLMs being pretty good at writing puts this on the backfoot a bit. If a machine can be trained to do it well, without being a sapient being, then surely there must be something to the mechanics of it that can be broken down into component parts and understood on a more base level. Through deconstruction of the process, the priest doing alchemy becomes a scientist doing chemistry.