This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive
Anti-nuclear people are crazy to me. How does anyone actually argue this policy without looking like a dumbass
its geen energy. but in cartoons it’s a glowy mountain dew color and i fankly dont like that. everyone abandon nuclear energy NOW!!!! /sarc + typos intended
I looked up on this topic a year ago, and it seemed that renewal energy has become so cheap that it was just cheaper to overproduce solar/wind and move water around to store the energy as potential energy. That and given the timings of a nuclear center* versus a solar farm, it rather seems counterproductive.
So in the US there's at least some case to be made against the way we handle spent nuclear fuel. Unlike pretty much the rest of the world, we store our spent fuel rather than recycle it. This of course poses environmental risks if the storage ever fails, which of course it does when built to monopoly finance capital spec.