this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
63 points (95.7% liked)
Science
7014 readers
29 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I work professionally in the field of pharmaceutical manufacturing, though mainly with liquid and lyophilized presentations. The issue talked about in this video, polymorphism and isomerization, would primarily just be an issue with drugs that are considered small molecules. Historically, that is most drugs...but that is changing as more and more other modalities are hitting the market.
Small molecules, especially in a dry powder, undergo lots of processes that would make cleaning with enough rigor to completely eliminate a polymorph extremely difficult. Things like milling, mixing, spray drying, and pressing are extremely energetic and intentionally disperse powder like crazy. The cleaning cycles for all this equipment are already extremely rigorous, often reducing contaminants to levels too low to measure and then undergoing sterilization cycles with vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) between batches. However, when you are talking about autocatalysis like this, it only takes ppb-level contamination to propagate through the whole batch.
When you are talking about large molecules like biologics (antibodies, most vaccines, etc.), there are a whole bunch of other things that can go wrong, but not this. The most analogous thing I can think of would be a persistent viral contamination. Current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) should be able to alleviate this though, and it wouldn't impact tech transfer to a different site like what happened in the video. Alternatively, I have worked on mAbs where each batch would measure the glycosylation state because it impacted activity. That is a post-translational modification process for that drug that some batches worked better than others, but we never really tracked down a root cause (before the program was killed).
Another case study that happened on a program I was working on was that we had a series of batches where the active ingredient (a mAb) was oxidized at a much higher rate than normal. Nothing about our process had changed, but it was a clear night/day difference that happened all of a sudden. After lots of testing and ruling things out, we managed to figure out that there were elevated levels of iron in our product. By sampling at each step of our process, we figured out that the iron was being introduced during two steps called bioburden reduction filtration and sterile filtration. You might notice that these are both unit operations where our drug passes through filter membranes (they were in fact the same filters). Ultimately, it turned out that the supplier of our filters had a contamination issue that impacted their filters from a certain lot and later. So, we were ultimately able to fix it, but I remember those reports being literally hundreds of pages of ruling stuff out before we finally figured out the root cause.
Hope that helps you feel better!
For protein based drugs there are prions: misfolded protein isoforms able to catalytically convert correctly folded proteins, basically following the same logic as the examples of smaller molecules. So far I guess we only know of one group of proteins that do this (like the mad cow disease one) but theoretically it could always happen to others we just don't know about yet. :)
Sorry if that made anyone feel worse again..
Coming from a regulatory area, it's interesting to hear about this from a manufacturer point of view.
Great and very accurate post.
Oh man, give me a scientific issue any day of the week. I would much rather deal with some investigation rather than work on an IND, BLA, or MAA section to submit to an agency. I have tremendous respect for reg folks that can make sense of the agency guidance. Thank you for your service!
Same. But if I was back in the lab, would I want to do something outside of it? I don't know. I do miss lab stuff though.
Maybe evaluation would be more accurate or a term, I'm the one in part reviewing the submissions at the agency.
Thank you for what you do as well, I think the industry portion sounds more interesting than my end haha.
Regulatory? Nice to hear some of you survived till today. Good luck buddy, I'm rooting for you!
Thanks! We're actually actively hiring due to backlogs of drug submissions. I definitely prefer the chemistry aspect to equipment validation and such, but what can you do?
Thank you!! You're awesome to read.