Funny

15017 readers

142 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

170

"discovered" (suppo.fi)

submitted 2 weeks ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MacAnus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's just all use the Holocene calendar.

I learned about it in This episode of The Rest is Science with Hannah fry and Michael Stevens from Vsauce, if you wanna learn cool stuff about our calendars...

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Still fundamentally linked to the estimate of Christ's birth by Dionysius Exiguus, just with an added +10000. To fully unlink that you'd have to find a date that far back or father to link year 0 to that you're sure about and the farther back you go the harder that is.

[–] MacAnus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Right. But atleast we'd be done with the BCEs.

You're making me wonder what event (that we can precisely date) was/will be important enough worldwide for it to be used as year zero?