this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
74 points (97.4% liked)

Photography

7444 readers
61 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been working mostly in black and white street photography, where the frame often depends more on weight, shadow, and timing than on clean description.

In this image, I let the blacks get quite heavy because I wanted the figure and the surrounding space to feel slightly hostile, not neatly readable. I’m never fully sure where that line sits: when does contrast become atmosphere, and when does it simply start eating the photograph?

Shot in harsh available light, edited with the shadows left deliberately dense rather than rescued.

Would you pull more detail back from the black areas, or does the loss of information help the image?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Most black I see still has plenty of definition, so I don't think you overdid it.

[–] streetsoul@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, that’s reassuring. I wanted the blacks to feel heavy, but not dead. There’s a difference between depth and just throwing a bucket of ink over the frame, though photography forums sometimes pretend that’s a philosophy.

I may still test the upper tones a bit, but I agree: the shadows keep enough texture and detail to hold the image together.> Most black I see still has plenty of definition, so I don’t think you overdid it.

Body