He said that most palestinians left by their own and not forced by isrsel destroying hundred of villages. He is using hamas and hizbollah as an excuse to justify iarael starting the war knowing very well israel's ideology of ethenic cleansing.

Shameful to defend those type of people

Right, I wasn't talking about that comment. There are the liberal zionists and the honest zionists but you can see past the mask when they use their dog whistles like "Israel proper": What other "Israel" is there? Well, the yet-unsettled "Israel" of course. South lebanon, gaza, west bank. "From the river to the sea" is actually also used by the zionists ^[see: https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/original-party-platform-of-the-likud-party] and the call "palestine will be free" is the counter to that. So when they say that it's call to genocide, they mean that because that's how they use it. But it's not true when we use it.

And you can clearly see the many many hasbara talking points, which I don't care to debunk one-by-one. If you actually want to learn more yourself you can look any of these up on websites like palestineremembered.com, since a lot of it is downplaying the nakba https://www.palestineremembered.com/WhatIsNakba.html is a good place to start I think. There is also https://decolonizepalestine.com/ which is a lot less dense in historical detail if you're looking for a general overview. I'm sure there are other great websites, these two are my go-to if someone is spreading lies and I have the time and energy to debunk them.