this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
105 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

84299 readers
3646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AES-128 is safe against quantum computers. SHA-256 is safe against quantum computers. No symmetric key sizes have to change as part of the post-quantum transition. This is a near-consensus opinion amongst experts and standardization bodies and it needs to propagate to the rest of the IT community. The rest of this article backs up this claim both technically and with references to relevant authorities.

Original article: https://words.filippo.io/128-bits/

TL;DR: https://hackaday.com/2026/04/25/quantum-computers-are-not-a-threat-to-128-bit-symmetric-keys/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As expected the same dipshits pushing AI also lied about what quantum computing even is.

I'm imagining if I had said this even a month ago even though it's what I've thought for years.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's most likely not the same people, as AI destroyed quantum computing. A person strongly invested into quantum computing would be crazy to push for AI.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)