this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)
Work Reform
16332 readers
40 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
How does this compare to first past the post? Does it make any difference in outcomes?
Reading the article it sounds simpler to me, but without weighting the selections (like ranked choice) it just sounds like Dems would select every Dem, and Republicans would just select every Republican - not really changing the outcome.
Yes. It may be the only chance American Democrats have of winning any future elections.
The next wildcard candidate will attract a bunch of votes, while a Democrat who stands for shitty compeomises could still get a "better than the other asshole" approval vote.
I doubt it. Dem and wildcard liberal will get same amount of votes. Republican and wildcard conservative will get same amount of votes.
Except there's no non-wildcard Republican candidate.
They've cracked the formula for telling their voter base that this time will be different and anti-establishment.
While the Democrats have solved for how to exhaust their voter base patience.
Approval based voting is the only way the Democratic party remains a player in American politics.