this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
467 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

84597 readers
4507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

GrapheneOS works great for me. Not a lot you can do on stock android that you can’t do on GrapheneOS. I would highly recommend anyone looking for privacy to look into it. Very very easy to install. Just make sure you have a Pixel phone that is unlocked. I’ve been using it as my daily driver for two years now.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

GrapheneOS isn't a replacement for Google Photos though? What do you use for photo backups? (Immich seems like the obvious answer, but I'd like to know if there's more options out there)

[–] snrkl@lemmus.org 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It let's you run Google Photos without network permissions and with storage scopes limiting it to certain folders.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Does the photo search still work offline? It doesn't for me. That seems like it'd be the only reason to stick with that app if you're not using the cloud storage, otherwise I might as well just use a basic file browser.

[–] steel_for_humans@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

My only issue is with banking apps and our national ID app which is very useful. I know some work, but I haven't seen all that I have listed, so I would have to be the guinea pig :) I actually have an older Pixel phone with a shattered screen, I was planning to have it repaired, so I guess that's where I can test GrapheneOS safely.

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's so easy to install! You just need to be in the 3% of smartphone owners who actually have one! EASY!

rolls eyes

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean it's difficult to install though.

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool, I have a Samsung S23fe, please feel free to install it for me. I'll wait.

Admittedly, being facetious there, but my point is that if it requires a specific device that most people don't have to install, then it is not easy to install for most people, because it literally cannot be.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn't make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

... what exactly do you think the phase "impossibly difficult" means? Because "impossible" is a level of difficulty ie. THEY ARE NOT DIFFERENT THINGS

Impossibly difficult is an oxymoron. If something is impossible, it can't be difficult because if it is difficult that means its very hard to achieve but still possible. If something is impossible, that means you cannot do it, full stop. It is not possible. Those are two completely different things.

[–] Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Huh? It's a replacement for android for pixel phones. Therefore it works on.... Pixel phones...

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My point is that if it requires a specific device that most people don't have to install, then it is not easy to install for most people, because it literally cannot be.

[–] Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But it's not for most people. It's for Google pixel users, that's the whole point! That's like saying oh this diesel sucks and isn't user friendly because it doesn't work in my petrol car. That's because it isn't for your car.

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then don't recommend it for people that can't use it, JFC.

[–] Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No one is doing that. YOU'RE the one here that is getting angry at nothing. It's just an option for pixel users, who are one of the only demographics locked into Google photos. Other phone users are free to use their stock photo app. You've clearly just misunderstood the original comment and are trying to save face.