this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
17 points (100.0% liked)

Communism

10243 readers
2 users here now

Discussion Community for fellow Marxist-Leninists and other Marxists.

Rules for /c/communism

Rules that visitors must follow to participate. May be used as reasons to report or ban.

  1. No non-marxists

This subreddit is here to facilitate discussion between marxists.

There are other communities aimed at helping along new communists. This community isn't here to convert naysayers to marxism.

If you are a member of the police, armed forces, or any other part of the repressive state apparatus of capitalist nations, you will be banned.

  1. No oppressive language

Do not attempt to justify your use of oppressive language.

Doing this will almost assuredly result in a ban. Accept the criticism in a principled manner, edit your post or comment accordingly, and move on, learning from your mistake.

We believe that speech, like everything else, has a class character, and that some speech can be oppressive. This is why speech that is patriarchal, white supremacist, cissupremacist, homophobic, ableist, or otherwise oppressive is banned.

TERF is not a slur.

  1. No low quality or off-topic posts

Posts that are low-effort or otherwise irrelevant will be removed.

This is not a place to engage in meta-drama or discuss random reactionaries on lemmy or anywhere else.

This includes memes and circlejerking.

This includes most images, such as random books or memorabilia you found.

We ask that amerikan posters refrain from posting about US bourgeois politics. The rest of the world really doesn’t care that much.

  1. No basic questions about marxism

Posts asking entry-level questions will be removed.

Questions like “What is Maoism?” or “Why do Stalinists believe what they do?” will be removed, as they are not the focus on this forum.

  1. No sectarianism

Marxists of all tendencies are welcome here.

Refrain from sectarianism, defined here as unprincipled criticism. Posts trash-talking a certain tendency or marxist figure will be removed. Circlejerking, throwing insults around, and other pettiness is unacceptable.

If criticisms must be made, make them in a principled manner, applying Marxist analysis.

The goal of this subreddit is the accretion of theory and knowledge and the promotion of quality discussion and criticism.

Check out ProleWiki for a communist wikipedia.

Communism study guide

bottombanner

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

an analysis of the root issue in civil unrest, pretty good imo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose what needs to be asked here is why does the coastal regions seem to have far more organised communists than the rural regions?

Would rural people appreciate or listen to communists that moved there just to try and agitate them toward communism?

What about what few comrades exist within these rural areas? How many of them have tried to organise rural folk but failed?

This position gets floated a lot in UK spaces as well, that comrades from London ought to be airdropped into the forgotten and left behind parts of Britain where community barely exists and there is no work whatsoever to do. There is a reason there are more communists in urban centres with more proletarian work available.

[–] demeritum@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Most rural populations are either kulaks, sub-proletarian or commuters. I do think we are beyond the vast revolutionary potential in rural areas since farmhands dont really exist anymore (make an exception for the “cheap labor”-force from Eastern Europe). The rural areas of past were quite different, the communal sense is basically dead and people have emptied out.

[–] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd avoid using Kulaks because this term does not apply to the US current material conditions. But I agree with you, Mao's strategy of encircling urban areas from the countryside wouldn't work because nowadays the rural areas aren't as populous anymore. We'd hardly ever have a strong base there, even if we managed to convince a lot of rural workers to join the communist movement. So yeah, I don't think the strategy is applicable for the US or UK.

In Brazil, which is still an agrarian nation (and on most global South nations that depend on agriculture), this strategy could have benefits. But even in Brazil's case, focusing on the urban proletariat is still important.

[–] demeritum@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I used kulaks more flippantly, it has more bite than owner of large scale industrial farms or Manager of a Cargill Inc plant. I agree with the rest of your analysis though.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think you're under-counting migrant labor in rural areas - they might have some revolutionary potential.