this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
13 points (84.2% liked)

AskHistorians

1311 readers
45 users here now

QUESTIONS

  1. Be civil.
  2. Be specific.
  3. Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
  4. Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.

RESPONSES

  1. Be civil.
  2. Provide comprehensive answers.
  3. Sources are welcome, but not required.

askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reagan, but Reagan was made possible by the Southern Strategy, which itself was a long product of the never-started recovery from the Civil War, which was due to the loss of Lincoln's leadership.

There have been ups and downs, so the answer to your question of a hard decline is probably more recent events, but they couldn't have happened without prior ones that paved the way. Just like all the positives.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really wish Lincoln hadn’t been assassinated. He didn’t just want to reclaim the South; he wanted to reintegrate them and heal the massive sociopolitical wounds. I think the country would be significantly better off if he had been alive to carry out his plans.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's an oversimplistic comparison and maybe wasn't fully possible, but imagine a post-Civil War US where the North did for the South what the US and other countries did for West Germany and Japan.

You mean, transform them into cowed little manufacturers of quality automobiles while they still inwardly remain seethingly racist?