this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
323 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

11744 readers
1048 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is horrible, but the title is quite misleading.

Person keeled over unlisted reason

Someone started performing CPR

Management refused to let another come over to sub in when person 1 got tired because it needed to be management or the safety team. Presumably, the safety team would be the relief. My guess is risk of letting an untrained employee help was risk. The first person started cpr before management got there or they would have stopped them too.

Management told everyone to get back to work and not to gawk.

Person died

The news that it happened wasn't released for a week.

All brought to the surface by a Senate hearing on the lack of worker safety at Amazon.

So a person died, maybe work-related. The company gives 0 fucks about other workers' emotional state.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Its not misleading, both claims are true. If people refuse to read articles and only read headlines thats not on the author.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

OP's version was indeed misleading, making us suppose there was a corpse on the warehouse for a week while management covered it up & made everyone keep working around it.

rumba@lemmy.zip's explanation was much more detailed & accurate & appreciated.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Again, its only misleading if you never intend to read the article.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's a four-panel comic cartoon. Now that you mention there is a big blue link under it but most people are conditioned not to click those because we've been stung by too many cancerous links full of firewalls & ads & popups.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

disagree on the last part.

headlines cannot be outright false to their contents, it is acceptable to assume the headline is true to the article

that doesn't change that in this case the headline clearly has two separate claims

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If false is your bar for misleading, nothing is ever misleading. Misleading statements need to be true to be misleading, otherwise they're just lies.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm more saying headlines dont contain all the context required, thats what the article is for. Article titles can't be misleading unless you won't read the article.