this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
25 points (80.5% liked)
Books
8071 readers
16 users here now
A community for all things related to Books.
Rules
- Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
- No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
- No self promotion.
Official Bingo Posts:
Related Communities
- !books@piefed.world (Piefed Sibling Community)
- !comicbooks@lemmy.world
- !fantasy@lemmy.ml
Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can think of a few series that had books where I really enjoyed the first books, but felt that the series went downhill over time. The Dune Chronicles
I really liked the first book, but the later books just got progressively worse, in my opinion. Or Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
But I can't think of any series where I had a bad first book and then the thing progressively got better.
Granted, that may be selection bias
maybe I just never complete a series if the first book is bad.
It’s widely regarded that the first 2.5-3 books in The Dresden Files are the weakest writing. Not bad, but immature writing skill.
The series gets very good and deeply engaging after that, but that’s a close comparison to what you mentioned.
I’m trying to be considerate in not naming the series and thus insulting the fandom, but I said the first book ended poorly… I didn’t say it was bad. For what it was… it was exciting in places and enjoyable, but by the measure of novel structure: F grade