this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
127 points (94.4% liked)

Memes of Production

1590 readers
679 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] expr@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

LLM slop is not welcome here.

[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What a weird conversation terminating comment. All the information is referenced. Are you suggesting we should disregard Google results even if the references confirm the information? The Japanese military IS NOT under US command in emergency situations. If you believe otherwise I look forward to your evidence to the contrary.

[–] expr@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, I'm saying you should link to actual sources instead of whatever an LLM decided to barf out (which may or may not be rife with inaccuracies).

Posting garbage like that is both a recipe for spreading misinformation (and we have strong evidence that LLMs greatly increase the potency and spread of misinformation), as well as devolving intellectual discourse into users just tossing slop back and get forth at each other. It would be trivial to make an LLM say the opposite of what you claim. So why should one trust the text spewed out by your LLM vs the text spewed out by someone else's? Regardless if what you say is true, giving us the garbage from an LLM as "supporting evidence" completely undermines what you are trying to say.

Find real sources and link them. It raises the quality of discussion and makes the internet an ever so slightly better place.

[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You've already been told by someone else that this is not inaccurate and you are fully able to research it yourself. If you want to "raise the quality of discussion" please do so. So far I see very little evidence of that.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The slop may happen to mostly be correct this time. Did you actually follow it up and verify it was true before you posted it?

Or did you post a question to Google and copy out the LLM response as if it said something true?

[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"The slop may happen to mostly be correct this time." I'm glad you understand that now. There really isn't anything else to discuss. This was never about AI Slop. That's just a distraction.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

No, this was about AI slop. People shouldn't post AI slop.

[–] expr@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's all it's about. I was never disputing your claim, but your methods.

[–] blueberrycrumble@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

pretty sure you are wrong