this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
81 points (90.9% liked)

science

26837 readers
606 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 weeks ago (30 children)

Man, they are gonna have to start actually paying the wage slaves if they want them to make more wage slaves.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (23 children)

Weird how people keep saying things like this despite the clear inverse relationship between income and fertility.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Incomes for the bottom 99% have stagnated over the last 30 years, so how do you reconcile that with this reported drop in fertility? I don't think it's weird that people see a causal relationship where one obviously exists. I think that the inverse relationship that you're talking about is only one factor in influencing fertility rates, and you're conflating incomes with affordability.

[–] Mondez 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fertility rates have been falling across the world since the baby boom that followed WW2 in line with greater female education and labour market participation. Also people from poorer and less educated background in wealthy countries are the people who have the highest fertility rates.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)