this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
3 points (100.0% liked)

Hydrogen

669 readers
15 users here now

A community about hydrogen and its use as a way to fight climate change.

Rules

This community has been migrated from:
fedia.io/m/hydrogen
fedia.io/m/hydrogen@kbin.social(Original server is defunct)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Retaining flexibility may prove more valuable than going all in too early on a single bet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Lithium being extremely flammable and dangerous in crashes is fake news/misleading propaganda. It is safer than gas. Hydrogen is among the most explosive gases. A containment breach in an accident is not vented easily and may make movie style car crashes a reality.

Hydrogen may form methane in the upper atmosphere after leakage and hence substantially contribute to ghg load even when there is only minor leakage. The precise numbers are not known yet, as far as I know. It is not a miracle gas. For example Jülich is researching this: https://www.fz-juelich.de/en/ice/ice-4/research/hydrogen-impacts-on-the-climate-system

[–] Hypx@piefed.social 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Then you are falling for battery propaganda. There have been many deaths related to battery fires. This has been well documented. Meanwhile, hydrogen deaths are nearly zero. The fuel does not concentrate enough to be all that dangerous. There have been zero "movies style car crashes".

Your study is basically the fossil fuel propaganda I'm talking about. It openly admits that hydrogen is not a direct GHG. So it conjures up a hypothetical situation where it extends the life of methane in the atmosphere. Even if it is real, it goes away once methane emissions stop. It can only be a problem if we fail to stop fossil fuel use.