this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
91 points (87.0% liked)
Inventing Reality
530 readers
282 users here now
When the media decides who you are rooting for.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Again, there's a difference between complicity via silence, and complicity via an active bombing campaign. Neither is good by any stretch of the imagination, but the latter is clearly worse than the former.
The Biden administration actively structured it's weapon shipments in such a way that they wouldn't trigger Congressional oversight, they actively ran with the "Hamas 40 beheaded babies" blood libel, they actively condemned anti genocide protestors, they actively sent special forces to build that pier they used for a hospital massacre, they are are as actively complicit as it is possible to be.
Selling weapons to them and defending their actions publicly isn't silence.
I don't understand your point. Both of them have a massive track record of lying. But the one thing Trump did actually have was a record of not starting any wars in his previous presidency. Both of them are in the pocket of AIPAC but Kamala was signalling that if Iran didn't agree to a "diplomatic solution" then she would start a war. Which is literally what Trump did was well. He told Iran to give up the nukes. Iran said no. Then he bombed Iran.
The difference is worthless, your opinions are worthless
No, you're wrong. One is complicity via an active bombing campaign but better PR, and the other is an active bombing campaign with bad PR.
Both are war criminals that deserve the guillotine